Friday, September 19, 2008

Importance of The Family

Importance of  The Family
Back in the old days, when our race was healthy, it was common knowledge that large families were the key to future greatness. In the years immediately preceding the rise of both Greece and Rome the average home contained two parents, and three or more children. This was the prerequisite for all their later accomplishments. Shortly after the situation was reversed, with empty cribs becoming the norm, these states began to decline.

Let’s bring this discussion closer to home. Here is the primary question we need to answer: Why aren’t National Socialist couples having more children? To begin with, there are some in our ranks who work to keep women out of the movement. Yes, these individuals constantly inform us about how terrible the female sex really is, and then whine pathetically: “ There must be one good woman left somewhere.”

You don’t need a master’s degree in psychology to predict the consequences of such behavior. None of our men like it when a feminist says that we’re all worthless, so there’s no sense blaming women for avoiding those who treat them in a similar manner. Fortunately, this attitude hasn’t infected the entire movement; no, it is only promoted by lonely, wanna-be racist Romeos suffering from the “poor me, I don’t have a girlfriend” syndrome. This does us some harm, especially when these people act as a young girls first contact, but in reality they’re the least of our problems – which is why we’ll move on to more serious concerns.

It has been said that white women are too materialistic, and this keeps them from making decent wives. Even if there is some truth here, let’s take a look at reality: a woman’s instincts have always, and will always, tell her that a successful man makes a better husband and father. This is natural, and it wasn’t a bad thing until honor and courage were no longer synonymous with public esteem.

The trouble starts, however, the moment economic considerations become the most important standard of judgment. If money is everything then the scoundrel will generally find it easier to accumulate wealth, as those who possess scruples will hesitate before doing what it takes. Example: you can make five million dollars poisoning our young people with cocaine. It’s a can’t miss proposition, with a low risk factor. Are you going to do it? Me neither, but someone will, and (financially speaking) they’ll be sitting pretty.

Once things reach this stage, marriages are made out of convenience, love is removed from the equation, and it is the children who suffer. That shouldn’t be a shock, since most of us can’t compete economically with a Jew banker or black athlete. This would be a reason to despair, if there wasn’t a solution, but that isn’t the case. While we may not have the biggest wallets there is an area where no one else can compete with us.

You see, the same natural instincts we discussed earlier also tell a woman that she should desire a man – by which I mean someone who really is one. Going back to this example, if a human puke has a huge bank account because he poisoned our people, his reward shouldn’t be a beautiful white woman, but rather a bullet in the head. In other words, whiners are never respected, but men rarely have trouble with a lack of interest from the opposite sex.

Anther objection against having kids goes something like this: “Many of us will have to risk our lives to overthrow the existing power structure; therefore it would be wrong to leave a woman with a house full of children.” Perhaps, but the revolutionary is forced to respond by pointing out that it does no good to win on the field of battle, if we’re only going to lose the victory due to an inability to replace our best blood.

This is a very real concern; as initially only the most dedicated will even consider acting upon their beliefs. Certainly, that rules out most who offer the “high risk” excuse for not having families, but even sincere individuals need to remember the following facts: In Europe more whites die each year than are being born. Things aren’t much better in the United States, and such problems are only going to get worse once shots are fired – unless we’re prepared, and begin correcting the problem immediately.

Personally, I believe a man with kids has more to fight for. Others disagree, and say a family enables the System to get a handle on you. Maybe. Then again, people who always find reasons not to act, probably never would anyway. Still, a widow left caring for a house of children deserves not only our sympathy, but also our support. I should add that there will be no victory unless all of us are willing to sacrifice, and women often prove tougher than some might imagine.

Financial difficulties are another factor that prevents many young whites from marrying and having children. Early marriage is important for two reasons: first, it prevents a generation gap from developing. If too many years separate parents from their kids, it becomes a lot harder for either side to communicate properly. Second, almost everyone in their 30’s has had at least one bad relationship. Once this happens the individual becomes cynical, and this makes it difficult to create the mutual trust that is so important for a stable home life.

There is a simple way to overcome the problems caused by financial hardships: we need to help each other. There is nothing stopping a handful of families from getting together and home schooling their children. If everyone kicked in, it would allow a couple of mothers to teach full time. In fact, numerous avenues exist for us to alleviate cost of living concerns, but they require idealistic behavior, combined with a desire to assist our kinfolks. This is the type of morality we want to build a society around, but an inability to practice it on a small scale would reveal that we’re just playing games.

This is our motto: We must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children. It is obvious that one way to accomplish this involves having large families – as our race and our beliefs live on through them. Yes, many movement comedians have told you the exact opposite, but think about this: National Socialists often discuss the possibility of racial extinction. Numerically, we’re already a tiny minority on this planet, and neglecting to have children does nothing except further the goals of our enemies. I doubt that is what any of us want, so we should be glad that the solution is so obvious.

No comments: